Should Cardinal Brady Resign?

Should Cardinal Brady resign? Yes is the short answer. I am sure that he probably feels he is being hounded by a blood-thirsty press pack. And to some extent he is right.

However, as far as I am concerned he only has one question to ask and answer for himself: could I have done something to prevent the rape and abuse of boys and girls? The answer is yes. Ergo he should go. How can his own conscience allow anything else? How can he sleep at night with the stories of what happened going round in his head - knowing that he could have stopped such an evil man as Brendan Smith.

Young children were raped....has that word lost some its power even in all of the obfuscataion thats been so prevalent in recent months...Young children were RAPED and BUGGERED and ABUSED for almost a further 20 years after he as a 36 year old priest - a Canon Lawyer, not some uneducated, unwordlywise novice - knew about it AND WAS IN A POSITION TO MAKE SURE IT NEVER HAPPENED AGAIN.

He wasn't the only one, to be sure but if he accepts the principle that the Bishops who have already resigned as a a result of their sins of ommission (at the very least) then he too must go.

How many children and even lives could have been saved if he had only spoken up? Does he need to ask himself anything else? I don't think so.

Nobody is saying that he was an abuser - but he did nothing to ensure that an abuser was stopped. Not good enough. Enough said.

Bishops Have No Place To Hide

I watched open-mouthed last night as Vincent Brown replayed on his TV3 programme last night, yesterdays press conference which took place after the Bishops Spring conference/meeting.

They seem to be thoroughly fed-up with the spot light and blame which is being put upon them in the wake of the Murphy Report which detailed the cover-up of extensive sexual abuse cases and the - as Vincent called it - complicity of the Bishops in not stopping and even allowing those abuses to continue.

Perhaps, with no escape, no one accepting their side, no-one caring how much this catharsis is hurting (some of) them and nowhere to hide the Bishops will finally get some tiny little inkling of how those children felt when the church failed to stop their abusers when they, as small, innocent children, in the care of (or at the mercy of) the 'Church' had nowhere to hide from their abusers and no-one would stop it or even listen to them.

Still no atonement obvious from the Church. Indeed they seem to be going backwards. Some of them just don't seem to get it at all. It's all about them. It's a terrible terrible shame - and those Bishops yesterday should be ashamed of themselves.

International Womens Day - Does It Mean Anything?

Today, March 8th is International Women's Day and I suppose its a fair question to ask: what does it mean? Why do we have it? Is it needed? Well in my opinion, it is probably more needed now than ever. Why? Because I think we've gone way overboard with what we tolerate as acceptable for our daughters (and sons - but in the spirit of the day I'll stick to girls today).

What do I mean? Well, for example I was on the school run this morning listening to the radio (BEAT fm) when Rihannas (pictured above in a still taken from the video) latest song 'Rude Boy' came on. Now don't get me wrong I like Rihanna. I think she's beautiful, talented, smart and sexy. All good things. Now sexy is an objective thing and I was 16 myself once (yes, can you believe it?) but I have to say that I thought the lyrics of 'Rude Boy' were just way over the top. Listen for yourself I won't go into them here. The video is also quite sexualised with her looking down a guys trousers - among other bits of wriggling and overtly sexual movements.

So what's the relevance to Women's Day? Well it is this: women are once again - with their full knowledge and complicitness, it seems - being dragged down the 'you're only valuable if you're sexy, doing it, half naked and have a boyfriend who is 'big enough' (according to this particular song anyway). What are we doing to our younger women - Rihannas major target market? They are exposed every minute almost, it seems to these images in magazines, music videos, song lyrics - all the things that they enjoy - and those things are becoming baser and baser and more rude and lewd pratically by the minute.

Take a half an hour and watch your daughters favourite music video channel - I think you might be surprised by what you see - and she sees on practically every video: half naked women - each it seems competing with the next to see who can wear the least (or at least the most provocative), foul language, VERY suggestive movements. It's fairly unbelievable to be honest - and I can assure you I'm no prude.

But it does seem to me that we are losing ground here. Women - and mere girls - are once again being lauded not for their singing or song-writing talent, but for their bodies and the more suggestive the lyrics the better! The treatment of men in the same videos is almost entirely different (with some exceptions in fairness).

Am I being unreasonable? Is it okay for 8 year olds to be wearing Playboy clothes? Is is okay for young girls to be stripped half naked and simulating sex on TV - because make no bones about it but that's where we have gotten to? I say it is not - and I am beginning to agree seriously with the British researcher who called last week for certain music videos to be only allowed after the nine o'clock watershed. I would add to that that songs with overtly sexual lyrics should also only be allowed on radio after the 9 o'clock watershed! Next time it comes on I will certainly be switching it off if my seven year old son is in the car. But should I be turning it off when the 16 year old is in the car? Probably not. She is, after all, old enough to understand and put in context this type of sexualised song.....or is she?????

WIT WIT WIT

I listened with interest as Mr John Herlihy of Google Ireland (left above I think) spoke to Mary Wilson on Mondays 5-7 Live on RTE Radio 1. He was lamenting the fact that first class degrees in Ireland are being devalued (in his opinion) because too many of them are being handed out by Universities.

When Mary asked him where Google recruit from he said, more or less, that they pretty much stop after the seven Universities! I nearly crashed the car!! Now aside from the fact that computing degrees from WIT are MOST sought after in the workplace and that WIT is the top college in the Country (including the Universities) for graduate employment I found Mr Herlihys words both disingenuous and dangerous - giving, as they seemed to do, the impression that degrees which were not received at University were not as valuable as those that were. What a load of old cobblers! Did I hear him right? Surely I was dreaming??

But it does bring into sharp focus the need - as if we need to be reminded - for WIT to be designated as a University. If the rumours about Martin Cullen handing over his Ministerial portfolio are true - and if we revert back to type, whereby places in Ireland that do not have a voice at the Cabinet table regardless of the veracity of their case, get nothing - then that indeed will have made the fight all the more difficult.

On the Martin Cullen issue - if he is to resign for health reasons I for one wish him all the very best. He has been a good servant to Waterford and has delivered for this constituency. We would like to have gotten more and I am quite sure he would like to have delivered more. Party politics aside, on a personal note, Martin Cullen, in my opinion was always a decent man and a very very able politician - who was given the wrong end of the stick by a Dublin-centric and biased media who seemed to hate him without either knowing him, knowing why, or caring too much either way.

But back to the University issue - perhaps as a parting gift the Government might reward Martin if he is to go in a honourable fashion - and not in the usual cloud of ignominia that has become the trend of late - with that University designation tucked under his arm? After all, it would tick many boxes for the Government, underlining as it would their commitment to building a better Ireland an allowing us in the South East and our children to help them in that process. Is it too much to hope for? Probably. But it's not going away and is needed now more than ever.

Should Politicians Change Their Minds?

I wasn't actually going to write anything on this issue - not wishing to give the oxygen of publicity to YFG and the personalised campaign they have waged against me over the past few weeks and the fact that I changed my mind on the 80kph speed limit for the Outer Ring Road.

Firstly, and perhaps most depressingly, I am so disappointed at the tack that YFG has taken in how they have dealt with this issue - aping as it does the tired old, same old, failed old tactics of previous generations of Irish politicians. In fact it is one of the reasons which makes me rejoice that I am no longer part of a political party and no longer forced, sheep like, to follow the same well trodden paths already taken by so many un-worthies already. It is infinitely depressing that 'Young' Fine Gael have nothing new to add to the lexicon.

However, back to the issue. You would be forgiven for thinking that YFG had discovered the fourth secret of Fatima, they're that delighted with themselves. So what happened: I signed a YFG petition about 18 months ago supporting the raising of the speed limit on the Outer Ring Road to 80kph from its originally set speed of 60kph. They claim that this is somehow a private stance (????) at odds with my now public stance that the speed limit should remain at 60kph.

Now I will admit that the Outer Ring Road is a great new road - and any driver, not knowing the speed limit might be forgiven for assuming that it should be at least 80 if not 100kph. I am no different and prior to looking at the issue in more detail that would certainly have been my opinion. (Hence my signing the petition.)

So what happened? Am I some political deviant misleading the public as to my actual stance? Am I guilty of some dastardly skeletons-in-the-closet type political scandal? Quite simply I would contend: NO. So what happened then? I changed my mind - a move for which I make absolutely no apology.

The crux of the issue is perhaps, why did I change my mind? Was is to annoy YFG? No. (But that is a bonus!) Was it to ingratiate myself with the voters? No. Most people I speak to think that the speed should be increased to 80kph. Was it so that I could be accused of flip-flopping? No. This is generally seen as a weakness in politics (one which YFG, for example, are now seeking to exploit). So why then? Simply this. Information. I learned, in examining this issue that raising the speed limit to 80kph is just not the right thing to do in the current circumstances.

So what are those circumstances? Well, I ask you this: if you learned that something you wanted to do would increase the danger to people walking; would not be doable unless and until a lot of money - which you don't have - was spent to fix certain problems; would leave your organisation and perhaps yourself open to legal action as a consequence and that finally all the expert opinion was against your proposal; would you persist? Would you increase the danger? Would you risk yourself and/or the tax-payer being sued? Would you commit the money? Would you call the experts liars?

I would call that fool-hardy and irresponsible. But YFG seem to be advocating that despite all this, we should go ahead and change the speed limits - merely so that they as a political grouping can be seen to have rail-roaded through their proposal.

I for one say no. No to the speed increase unless and until the issues which have been identified are dealt with. No to YFG and their insistence that I stick by an opinion regardless of what I have learned and No to their tactic of trying to personally attack me for my stance(s) on this.

Furthermore, if and when the paths are separated from the roadway and some work is done on sight-lines in areas, I will, perhaps, consider something that is likely to enrage YFG even further - I may change my mind again!

The sooner the political parties young and old learn to change their minds as they learn more, the better I say. Perhaps that might stop us only half way down some of the blind alleyways we've been led down over the years by our politicl masters. It looks like FG will form some part of whatever our next Government in this Country will be - lets hope they will bring something new to the pot. On the evidence I am, sadly, not optimistic.

Finally I would ask Young Fine Gael one question: will they look in the eyes of any family who may suffer an injury or bereavement on the Outer Ring Road as a result of any speed limit increase and tell them that it was the right decision?

I will change my mind one hundred times rather than stick to a wrong decision - especially on an issue where lives, quite literally, are at stake. That surely, is the criteria and nothing else. When I change my mind because of something I have learned, I congratulate - not chastise - myself.

I hope I keep on learning for the rest of my life. I look forward to many more changes of mind! And furthermore I refuse to be bullied or cowed into submission by YFG - or anyone else. That, to me, is a political principle worth standing up for.

Young People Need Work Experience

I was speaking to a friend of mine yesterday and she told me about her son - who is a fully qualified engineer who cannot get a job. Nothing new here: it's unfortunately a far too common story these days. Then she told me that he was going to a new city to 'work for free' for a company so that at least he could get work experience. Now fair play to the guy and it's great that a company is prepared to give him this experience in a situation where it probably goes without saying that they can't afford to employ him (or anyone).

Now the problems of finding a job when you are unemployed are tough enough - but if you haven't even got any work experience then you're probably at the bottom of the barrel when it comes to handing out even the few jobs that are there. It's past time when the Government need to look at this issue specifically and perhaps come up with a way whereby companies could be incentivised to take on young people to give them some work experience - even if it is for no wage.

Now I know this is fraught with complications and could be abused and lots of other problems. But if this young man is prepared to go to the (extreme some would say) measure of working for nothing I am quite sure there are other young people who would be willing to do this too - for a limited time - in order to be able to get some work experience to put on their curriculum vitae. It's not ideal to be sure. But these are extraordinary times and maybe extraordinary measures are called for?

Of course another incentive would be eliminate what are essentially taxes on employing people - namely employers PRSI - which means that the more people you employ, the more money you pay the government for that privilege. That has to be crazy in this climate.

I find it difficult to understand why the government has not put an emergency jobs task force in place to identify measures we could take in tackling unemployment. There are obviously lots of different challenges out there for all the different groups. In the current circumstances I can't believe that it is no-ones job to be looking at this specific area and making recommendations which the Government would undertake as a matter of urgency.

Are FF, FG, Lab, Greens and the rest of them just too busy carving out notches on their respective belts recording the amount of damage they do to each other while the country, meanwhile goes to rack and ruin? Do they think that that impresses us or that we even care? I really detest party politics! They could all flog each other to death for all I care - I just wish they wouldn't do it on our time or in our name. I wish they would get on with the job that they claim they were elected to do and start tackling the real issues with some lateral thinking and some 'lets get off our asses and deal with this' attitude.

Maybe they are just trying to distract us from the fact that they don't have any ideas or don't know where to start when it comes to getting - or at least trying to get us - out of this creek that we've been landed in?

Enough with the distractions. Please - some ideas on the jobs front. Incentives; removal of barriers; new schemes, removal of blockages and anomalies in the system. A can do approach. Some urgency. Lives are being ruined here. Families split again - perhaps for life. Can't you at least try.

500 Days to go to Tallships Festival

From today there are exactly 500 days to go until the magnificent Tallships Festival returns to Waterford in June 2011 and those beautiful ships will grace our Quays once more. The website is now up and running at http://www.waterfordtallships.ie

There's a countdown timer there and the fact that the Christian Radich is the first Tallship already confirmed to attend at the festival.

The city that the festival will return to should be a different one that it attended in 2005 when they first visited here. The new Waterford Crystal factory and showrooms will be up and running on the Mall and a number of other developments with museums, Viking ships and other fantastic elements should all be in place.

The fact that the festival will fall on a weekend next year should also ensure even more visitors than the 500,000 people who came to Waterford for the event last time and I know that Des Whelan and his team are already working flat out to make the next festival even bigger and better than that magical one in 2005 - no small feat!

One thing we have as a city - which is a wonderful thing in these really really difficult times - is that we have so much to look forward to. We have to hope that all of these things will serve as a catalyst for lots more tourism development and as a result, job creation.

We are out there, doing it for ourselves. Can you do anything to help?

NEW A&E for WRH on the way at last?

Came across this press release on the HSE website - the A&E expansion at Waterford Regional Hospital has been approved and will go to re-tendering. http://www.hse.ie/eng/services/news/wrhed.html .

However 're-tendereing' is probably the key word in the release and I sincerely hope that the development of the A&E at WRH will go ahead THIS time - unlike previous times.

So while I welcome the announcement - I am not yet holding my breath.

In Light of George Lee's Resignation

In light of George Lee's resignation today I reprint an article I wrote last May asking 'Is Politics Broken'. I think Georges' experience gives a truth to what I thought then.


Politics is broken. I'm not talking about the tinkering around the edges, the numbers, the parties or even the corruption.

I'm talking about the seeming inability of elected politicians to be able to simply effect any change. That, after all is - or should be - why anyone goes into politics. I know there are some who go in for other reasons. Perhaps just because they can - maybe daddy passes them on a seat. Perhaps they like being in the spotlight. Perhaps they want to keep their party in power.

But most people I know go into politics because they believe they can make a difference. Make changes. And I don't think that's possible. Not where it matters anyway and thats in Dáil Éireann.

When TD's are running for election, they promise the world - and I guess maybe you have to on some level. But it must be the most frustrating thing to be a TD; to have promised the world; to believe in change; to want to deliver for your community.....only to be faced with a system that absolutely doesn't allow it. Not for the Opposition TDs. Not for back-benchers. Probably not even to any great extent for Ministers.

There is no way for TD's to individually make their mark, move their ideas or initiate any meaningful changes. Whether the party system has stifled it or it was ever there in the first place I don't know but it is broken and it needs fixing.

People need to have confidence that the TDs and the system that we are working under can reflect the changes that we as a society want. At the moment, the Dáil is an irrelevance - a circus sideshow not worth the time it takes to sit in the chamber (obvioused by the fact that so few bother to do so anyway).

It must be soul-destroying being so powerless in the most powerful - in theory - position in the land. No wonder TD's spend their time hoovering up local authority type requests - because they're the only thing they can actually deliver on - even though they've left the local authorities behind. It's why they run clinics. Because although they have a mandate to operate at national level - where are the mechanisms? Where can TD's initiate legislation or have it debated? Where can a single TD really engage with the public?

A real hard look needs to be taken at how the Dáil operates. It needs to become more relevant and flexible. It needs to give power to the people to whom the electorate have given power - the TD's and not just the 15 or so at the cabinet table. If TD's were actually able to make meaningful changes at national level I would hazard a guess that it wouldn't be long before they started getting their teeth into it (at least the ones who are in it to deliver change) and working on those national issues. I mean who would want to keep sorting out pot-holes when you can deliver on the big issues?

At local level, all elected Councillors - notwithstanding the odd inter-party clash - tend to work together on issues to deliver important things for their City or County or town. Why can not the Dáil or indeed the European Union operate like this? Why do Irish MEPs split up into different groupings in the EU and work against each other? Why are they not all on the same side? Why can TD's not initiate legislation on a cross party basis or even individually. Why can the Dáil not do 'what it says on the tin'? In extra-ordinary times, extra-ordinary measures are called for and choosing to go on in the same old way that we always have done is simply not good enough any more.

TD's need to work in a stimulating environment that is conducive to them being able to simply effect real change. Unless and until that happens, people will continue to be cynical and bored and disdainful of politics and politicians. And politicians will continue to be bored and un-inspired themselves.

Something needs to change and I would argue that it should be changed from within now, before its too late. TDs need to be allowed to work in the best interests of Ireland and the people who elect them and not merely serve as voting fodder in bewteen each election. They should all be required to deliver and the system should be changed to make sure that they do - and not the other way around as it seems to be at the moment.

Seafaring Festival Launched Today

I was delighted to be at the launch of a fun sounding new festival for Waterford City this evening in the Theatre Royal. The Waterford Seafaring Festival of Music & Song, the brainchild of our local sea shanty group Hooks & Crookes (pitured above singing at the event today), will run from May 28th-30th next in venues all around the city.

It should be mighty craic. Check out their website on www.hooksandcrookes.com for more details.

Could this be yet another beginning of good things happening in Waterford? There seems to me to be an air of almost general optimism permeating the city at the moment. Could it be true or am I mad?